
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Today is a new day
Saturday, July 30, 2011
On summer Poetry and apocalyptic dreams
Summer Poetry # 3
so quiet.
with maddening fortitude and tenacity
the volume does the void so magnify,
I hear the echo of a great hall in a closet
the sound of swallowing water clogs my ears
deaf to all but the great and persistent and fiercely confident voice
that isn't there
at all.
so very,
very
quiet.
Summer Poetry #2
out of determination
but if not from that
do it out of sheer spite.
let yourself be picked up
like a child
but if not like that
then
like a penny on the ground.
so many may have walked over you
but someone,
one among the many,
even while you lay pace planted on the road
saw you still had it,
worth.
Summer Poetry #1
Now
gone is gone is never gone is always and forever never
time is a twisted little twist of a devil
and love is and always never kind or forthright or civil
bewitched in betwixt the minefields we wander
through today before the future yesterday our hopes slay
faster and fiercer the pierce of and arrow that festers once entered
though we muster the shredded cluster of courage
the sepsis is imminent in the contentment of our sentiment
we must away tomorrow and today to live in tomorrow as it becomes today
but whether today tomorrow yesterday this moment has is will pass only now
Monday, April 11, 2011
More than one life to lead
Saturday, April 9, 2011
the metaphorical nail in my foot I got avoiding a metaphorical pile of dog poop
Saturday, January 29, 2011
My coffee is eating a hole in my stomach lining.
Monday, January 3, 2011
Banks are Evil
I'm eating chocolate to warm my bones,
in this wretched zone of alone.
my dishes are growing, my bed linens thinning,
banks' pockets thicken with every penny I stick in
their miserly backsides cause their swivel chairs to squeak
and then, I'm sinking again,
in cold old home,
eating chocolate to warm my bones
in this wretched zone of alone.
Saturday, January 1, 2011
How yelling at my ex across a street helped me become a better musician
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
morbid, but whatever
Sunday, November 28, 2010
"untitled" ooooooooh!
I feel the need quelquefois to express my daily depression.
The United Postal Service is giving me grief,
I decided to turn over a new leaf,
but there was mold on the other side,
or whatever those fuzzy things are. I can't decide.
to play any songs besides about some boy who's rude,
I'm ready for the Christmas songs, I won't lie
except The Little Drummer Boy makes me cry. a lot.
Dear God, another Christmas keeping company on a cot,
and explaining to relatives why it's a roommate I've got,
instead of a fiance or boyfriend or lascivious lover,
Christmas is coming and I'm taking cover.
Sunday, October 31, 2010
distracted by introspection
Monday, September 6, 2010
Dear Boys
Monday, August 30, 2010
Doubting Tobias
Whether Doubt is more Rational than Faith?
Objection 1: It would seem that to reason is to doubt, and is the rational opposite of faith. Descartes says that the essence of man is his reason. He arrives at this conclusion through a process of doubting everything, whittling his reality down to his own doubting thoughts, which he accepts as real because he is, in fact, thinking them. In the cogito, (“I think therefore I am”) he shows that to doubt is the base truth and ability of the human person, which is human reason.
Objection 2: Doubting may be defined as critical thinking which allows the thinker to deconstruct ideas, analyze the parts and their origins, and formulate opinions accordingly. This is also known as the reasoning process.
Objection 3: Doubt is necessary for examined faith. Man continually formulates and reformulates opinions though the process of doubting, i.e. reason, which includes the breaking down (doubting) and rebuilding (faith). Reason as a part of our free will allows us to be aware of and understand on varying levels why we believe and act a certain way. Therefore, it is more rational to doubt because faith is inherently dependent on a person’s ability to doubt that which he has faith in so that he can understand why he possesses the faith to being with.
On the contrary, “Even if faith is superior to reason there can never be a true divergence between faith and reason, since the same God who reveals the mysteries and bestows the gift of faith has also placed in the human spirit the light of reason. This God could not deny himself, nor could the truth ever contradict the truth” (Fides et Ratio chapter. 53. Quote from the First Vatican Council)
I answer that, The clash between doubt and faith can be compared to the “convictions” in Paul Ricoeur’s “hermeneutical detour” : Doubt and faith are two convictions which are navigated and governed through reason. Doubt should not be used synonymously with “reason” because it, as is faith, is merely a mode of reasoning, rather than reason itself; Doubting is not an end in itself. Rather, it must return to faith in some form as its product of reasoning. We formulate opinions through the process of having faith in some things and doubting others. Neither of these two, faith or doubt, is somehow contrary to human nature, nor is one less a part of the human rational being; and if both are part of our nature, than it follows that we should govern them with our reason. It is not possible to live in the state of doubt. Even while doubting, a person must be living positively in some way. For Descartes, his positive state was that he believed his mind (and its history) existed. While doubting is an acclaimed product of the modern, educated mind, and rightly so in the method of self-critique, it is incomplete without the necessary rebuilding of what it has broken down. In addition, it should be mentioned that doubt when it is not subject to the reasonable critique, it too may be as incomplete and unexamined as the faith it breaks down. Doubt which is not subject to the reasoning process, a constant movement back and forth between itself and faith, is simply another occasion of unexamined faith—or perhaps, just apathy. As I have stated above, it is impossible for a person to maintain a stasis of doubt.
Reply to Objection 1: Humans possess innate proclivities toward both doubt and faith, and we use our reason to choose when to doubt and when to have faith.
Reply to Objection 2: The first problem with defining doubt as reason is that it automatically takes faith out of the picture as something that is reasonable unless faith is modified by doubt (there is no faith without doubt.) Likewise, if faith were to be defined as reason, it would alienate doubt as something that is reasonable as well.
Reply to Objection 3: Faith is the product of examined doubt, towards which it is impossible for doubt not to aim. One cannot live in a state of doubt without also living in a state of faith on some level. For example: One who may doubt the existence of God will be likely to simultaneous harbor ardent belief in his own existence.
Diagram of the faith/doubt version of the Hermeneutic Arc:
faith |
| doubt
|
better |
faith |
|
V
REASON